scientific_literature_supporting_the_scientific_consensus_on_gmos
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
scientific_literature_supporting_the_scientific_consensus_on_gmos [2016/03/31 18:36] knigel |
scientific_literature_supporting_the_scientific_consensus_on_gmos [2016/03/31 18:58] (current) knigel |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ====== Review Papers ====== | + | ===== Environment ===== |
| - | There are hundreds of studies on GMO safety, and they are not all listed here. This list contains some of the larger or better-known reviews. To search for other studies, use the GENERA database created by Biofortified (above). | + | ==== Impact of genetically engineered crops on farm sustainability in the United States (2010) ==== |
| - | + | ||
| - | ===== Environment ===== | + | |
| - | * [[http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12804|Impact of genetically engineered crops on farm sustainability in the United States (2010)]] (book) | + | * [[http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12804|Book reference]] |
| * [[http://dels.nas.edu/resources/static-assets/materials-based-on-reports/reports-in-brief/genetically_engineered_crops_report_brief_final.pdf|Executive summary available here]] | * [[http://dels.nas.edu/resources/static-assets/materials-based-on-reports/reports-in-brief/genetically_engineered_crops_report_brief_final.pdf|Executive summary available here]] | ||
| - | **Editorials** | + | === Editorials === |
| * [[http://sites.psu.edu/tetherton/2010/04/21/genetically-engineered-crops-benefit-many-farmers/|Penn State Animal Science: Genetically engineered crops benefit many farmers]] | * [[http://sites.psu.edu/tetherton/2010/04/21/genetically-engineered-crops-benefit-many-farmers/|Penn State Animal Science: Genetically engineered crops benefit many farmers]] | ||
| * [[http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/04/100413112058.htm|Science Daily: Genetically engineered crops benefit many farmers, but the technology needs proper management to remain effective, report suggests]] | * [[http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/04/100413112058.htm|Science Daily: Genetically engineered crops benefit many farmers, but the technology needs proper management to remain effective, report suggests]] | ||
| - | [[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2169303|A meta-analysis of effects of Bt crops on honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) (2008)]] | + | ==== A meta-analysis of effects of Bt crops on honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) (2008) ==== |
| - | **Discussions** | + | * [[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2169303|Reference]] |
| + | |||
| + | === Discussions === | ||
| * [[https://www.facebook.com/groups/GMOSF/permalink/431784640294125/|GMO Skepti-Forum discusses Bt and bees on Facebook]] | * [[https://www.facebook.com/groups/GMOSF/permalink/431784640294125/|GMO Skepti-Forum discusses Bt and bees on Facebook]] | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| ===== Health ===== | ===== Health ===== | ||
| - | [[http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/content/early/2014/08/27/jas.2014-8124.abstract|Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations (2014)]] | + | ==== Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations (2014) ==== |
| + | |||
| + | * [[http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/content/early/2014/08/27/jas.2014-8124.abstract| Abstract]] | ||
| - | **Editorials** | + | === Editorials === |
| * [[http://www.forbes.com/sites/jonentine/2014/09/17/the-debate-about-gmo-safety-is-over-thanks-to-a-new-trillion-meal-study/|Forbes: The debate about GMO safety is over, thanks to a new trillion-meal study]] | * [[http://www.forbes.com/sites/jonentine/2014/09/17/the-debate-about-gmo-safety-is-over-thanks-to-a-new-trillion-meal-study/|Forbes: The debate about GMO safety is over, thanks to a new trillion-meal study]] | ||
| Line 29: | Line 31: | ||
| * [[http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140926101023.htm|Science Daily: No sign of health or nutrition problems from GMO livestock feed, study finds]] | * [[http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140926101023.htm|Science Daily: No sign of health or nutrition problems from GMO livestock feed, study finds]] | ||
| - | **Discussions** | + | === Discussions === |
| * [[https://www.facebook.com/groups/GMOSF/permalink/450270831778839/|GMO Skepti-Forum discusses van Eenennaam paper on Facebook]] | * [[https://www.facebook.com/groups/GMOSF/permalink/450270831778839/|GMO Skepti-Forum discusses van Eenennaam paper on Facebook]] | ||
| - | [[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278691511006399|Assessment of the health impact of GM plant diets in long-term and multigenerational animal feeding trials: A literature review (2011)]] | + | ==== Assessment of the health impact of GM plant diets in long-term and multigenerational animal feeding trials: A literature review (2011) ==== |
| + | |||
| + | * [[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278691511006399|Reference]] | ||
| - | **Editorials** | + | === Editorials === |
| * [[http://doccamiryan.wordpress.com/2011/12/14/no-long-term-effects-of-gmo-consumption-a-review-article-by-snell-et-al/|Cami Ryan: No long term effects of GMO consumption: a review article by Snell et al…]] | * [[http://doccamiryan.wordpress.com/2011/12/14/no-long-term-effects-of-gmo-consumption-a-review-article-by-snell-et-al/|Cami Ryan: No long term effects of GMO consumption: a review article by Snell et al…]] | ||
| * [[http://gmoanswers.com/ask/im-trying-avoid-conflicts-interest-so-i-was-just-wondering-if-all-scientists-who-test-long-terms|GMO Answers: I was just wondering if all the scientists who test the long terms safety issues of gmos work for Monsanto?]] | * [[http://gmoanswers.com/ask/im-trying-avoid-conflicts-interest-so-i-was-just-wondering-if-all-scientists-who-test-long-terms|GMO Answers: I was just wondering if all the scientists who test the long terms safety issues of gmos work for Monsanto?]] | ||
| - | [[http://www.ask-force.org/web/Food/NAP-Safety-GMO-Food-2004.pdf|Safety of genetically engineered foods (2004)]] | + | ==== Safety of genetically engineered foods (2004) ==== |
| + | |||
| + | * [[http://www.ask-force.org/web/Food/NAP-Safety-GMO-Food-2004.pdf|PDF]] | ||
| ===== Multiple Topics ===== | ===== Multiple Topics ===== | ||
| - | [[http://geneticliteracyproject.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Nicolia-20131.pdf|An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research (2013)]] | + | ==== An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research (2013) ==== |
| + | |||
| + | * [[http://geneticliteracyproject.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Nicolia-20131.pdf|PDF]] | ||
| - | **Editorials** | + | === Editorials === |
| * [[http://conversableeconomist.blogspot.com/2013/11/the-safety-of-bioengineered-crops.html|Conversable Economist: The safety of bioengineered crops]] | * [[http://conversableeconomist.blogspot.com/2013/11/the-safety-of-bioengineered-crops.html|Conversable Economist: The safety of bioengineered crops]] | ||
| Line 52: | Line 60: | ||
| * [[http://www.skepticalraptor.com/skepticalraptorblog.php/review-10-years-gmo-research-no-significant-dangers/|Skeptical Raptor: Review of 10 years of GMO research–no significant dangers]] | * [[http://www.skepticalraptor.com/skepticalraptorblog.php/review-10-years-gmo-research-no-significant-dangers/|Skeptical Raptor: Review of 10 years of GMO research–no significant dangers]] | ||
| - | **Discussions** | + | === Discussions === |
| * [[https://www.facebook.com/groups/GMOSF/permalink/434935769979012/|GMO Skepti-Forum discusses Nicolia review on Facebook]] | * [[https://www.facebook.com/groups/GMOSF/permalink/434935769979012/|GMO Skepti-Forum discusses Nicolia review on Facebook]] | ||
| - | [[http://ec.europa.eu/research/biosociety/pdf/a_decade_of_eu-funded_gmo_research.pdf|A decade of EU-funded GMO research (2010)]] | + | ===== A decade of EU-funded GMO research (2010) ===== |
| + | |||
| + | * [[http://ec.europa.eu/research/biosociety/pdf/a_decade_of_eu-funded_gmo_research.pdf|PDF]] | ||
| - | **Editorials** | + | === Editorials === |
| * [[http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-10-1688_en.htm|Press release: Commission publishes compendium of results of EU-funded research on genetically modified crops]] | * [[http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-10-1688_en.htm|Press release: Commission publishes compendium of results of EU-funded research on genetically modified crops]] | ||
| Line 64: | Line 74: | ||
| * [[http://westernfarmpress.com/management/gmo-research-again-points-safety-biotechnology|Western Farm Press: GMO research again points to safety of biotechnology]] | * [[http://westernfarmpress.com/management/gmo-research-again-points-safety-biotechnology|Western Farm Press: GMO research again points to safety of biotechnology]] | ||
| - | ==== Current Research ==== | + | ===== Current Research ===== |
| * [[http://www.rothamsted.ac.uk/our-science/rothamsted-gm-wheat-trial|Rothamsted GM Wheat Trial]] | * [[http://www.rothamsted.ac.uk/our-science/rothamsted-gm-wheat-trial|Rothamsted GM Wheat Trial]] | ||
| - | * [[http://genera.biofortified.org/viewall.php|The Genetic Engineering Risk Atlas]] (GENERA) was created by Biofortified to allow individuals to easily search the many available peer-reviewed papers on genetic engineering. | + | * [[http://genera.biofortified.org/viewall.php|The Genetic Engineering Risk Atlas]] (GENERA) was created by Biofortified to allow individuals to easily search the many available peer-reviewed papers on genetic engineering. There are hundreds of studies on GMO safety, and they are not all listed here. This list contains some of the larger or better-known reviews. |
| ===== Official Statements on Safety ===== | ===== Official Statements on Safety ===== | ||
| Line 79: | Line 89: | ||
| > “Currently available genetically modified foods are safe to eat. Food safety assessments by national regulatory agencies in several countries have deemed currently available GM foods to be as safe to eat as their conventional counterparts and suitable for human consumption. This view is shared by several intergovernmental agencies, including the FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius Commission on food safety, which has 162 member countries, the European Commission (EC), and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Further, there is no evidence of any ill effects from the consumption of foods containing genetically modified ingredients. Since GM crops were first cultivated commercially in 1995, many millions of meals have been made with GM ingredients and consumed by people in several countries, with no demonstrated adverse effects. Although currently available GM foods are considered safe to eat, this does not guarantee that no risks will be encountered as more foods are developed with novel characteristics. Ongoing evaluation of emerging products is required to ensure that new foods coming to market are safe for consumers. Food safety evaluation must be undertaken on a case-by-case basis. The extent of the risk evaluation should be proportionate to the possible risks involved with particular foods. There are also benefits to human health coming from GM foods. These may be either direct benefits arising from the content of certain foods or indirect benefits, which arise from changing agricultural practices.” | > “Currently available genetically modified foods are safe to eat. Food safety assessments by national regulatory agencies in several countries have deemed currently available GM foods to be as safe to eat as their conventional counterparts and suitable for human consumption. This view is shared by several intergovernmental agencies, including the FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius Commission on food safety, which has 162 member countries, the European Commission (EC), and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Further, there is no evidence of any ill effects from the consumption of foods containing genetically modified ingredients. Since GM crops were first cultivated commercially in 1995, many millions of meals have been made with GM ingredients and consumed by people in several countries, with no demonstrated adverse effects. Although currently available GM foods are considered safe to eat, this does not guarantee that no risks will be encountered as more foods are developed with novel characteristics. Ongoing evaluation of emerging products is required to ensure that new foods coming to market are safe for consumers. Food safety evaluation must be undertaken on a case-by-case basis. The extent of the risk evaluation should be proportionate to the possible risks involved with particular foods. There are also benefits to human health coming from GM foods. These may be either direct benefits arising from the content of certain foods or indirect benefits, which arise from changing agricultural practices.” | ||
| - | ==== 14 Italian scientific societies produced a Food Safety Consensus Document (PDF) ==== | + | [[http://www.siga.unina.it/circolari/Consensus_ITA.pdf|14 Italian scientific societies produced a Food Safety Consensus Document]] (PDF) |
| - | //“GMOs on the market today, having successfully passed all the tests and procedures necessary to authorization, are to be considered, on the basis of current knowledge, to be safe for use in human and animal foods.”// | + | > “GMOs on the market today, having successfully passed all the tests and procedures necessary to authorization, are to be considered, on the basis of current knowledge, to be safe for use in human and animal foods.” |
| - | ==== German Union of Academies of Science and Humanities) (Union der Deutschen Akademien der Wissenschaften) Commission Green Biotechnology: Are there health hazards for the consumer from eating genetically modified food? ==== | + | [[http://www.akademienunion.de/_files/memorandum_gentechnik/Memorandum_Green_BiotechnologyII.pdf|German Union of Academies of Science and Humanities) (Union der Deutschen Akademien der Wissenschaften) Commission Green Biotechnology: Are there health hazards for the consumer from eating genetically modified food?]] |
| - | //"Food derived from GM plants approved in the EU and the US poses no risks greater than those from “conventional” food. On the contrary, in some cases food from GM plants appears to be superior with respect to health."// | + | > "Food derived from GM plants approved in the EU and the US poses no risks greater than those from “conventional” food. On the contrary, in some cases food from GM plants appears to be superior with respect to health." |
| ===== Lists of References ===== | ===== Lists of References ===== | ||
| Line 97: | Line 107: | ||
| * [[http://www.skepticalraptor.com/skepticalraptorblog.php/science-gmo-safe/|Skeptical Raptor: What does science say about GMO’s–they’re safe]] | * [[http://www.skepticalraptor.com/skepticalraptorblog.php/science-gmo-safe/|Skeptical Raptor: What does science say about GMO’s–they’re safe]] | ||
| - | Discussions | + | **Discussions** |
| * [[https://www.facebook.com/groups/GMOSF/permalink/309997132472877/|GMO Skepti-Forum discusses safety studies on Facebook]] | * [[https://www.facebook.com/groups/GMOSF/permalink/309997132472877/|GMO Skepti-Forum discusses safety studies on Facebook]] | ||
scientific_literature_supporting_the_scientific_consensus_on_gmos.1459449416.txt.gz · Last modified: 2016/03/31 18:36 by knigel
Page Tools
