This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
scientific_literature_supporting_the_scientific_consensus_on_gmos [2016/03/31 18:44] knigel |
scientific_literature_supporting_the_scientific_consensus_on_gmos [2016/03/31 18:58] (current) knigel |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ====== Review Papers ====== | ||
| - | |||
| - | There are hundreds of studies on GMO safety, and they are not all listed here. This list contains some of the larger or better-known reviews. To search for other studies, use the GENERA database created by Biofortified (above). | ||
| - | |||
| ===== Environment ===== | ===== Environment ===== | ||
| ==== Impact of genetically engineered crops on farm sustainability in the United States (2010) ==== | ==== Impact of genetically engineered crops on farm sustainability in the United States (2010) ==== | ||
| - | * [[http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12804|(book)]] | + | * [[http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12804|Book reference]] |
| * [[http://dels.nas.edu/resources/static-assets/materials-based-on-reports/reports-in-brief/genetically_engineered_crops_report_brief_final.pdf|Executive summary available here]] | * [[http://dels.nas.edu/resources/static-assets/materials-based-on-reports/reports-in-brief/genetically_engineered_crops_report_brief_final.pdf|Executive summary available here]] | ||
| - | **Editorials** | + | === Editorials === |
| * [[http://sites.psu.edu/tetherton/2010/04/21/genetically-engineered-crops-benefit-many-farmers/|Penn State Animal Science: Genetically engineered crops benefit many farmers]] | * [[http://sites.psu.edu/tetherton/2010/04/21/genetically-engineered-crops-benefit-many-farmers/|Penn State Animal Science: Genetically engineered crops benefit many farmers]] | ||
| * [[http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/04/100413112058.htm|Science Daily: Genetically engineered crops benefit many farmers, but the technology needs proper management to remain effective, report suggests]] | * [[http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/04/100413112058.htm|Science Daily: Genetically engineered crops benefit many farmers, but the technology needs proper management to remain effective, report suggests]] | ||
| - | [[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2169303|A meta-analysis of effects of Bt crops on honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) (2008)]] | + | ==== A meta-analysis of effects of Bt crops on honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) (2008) ==== |
| - | **Discussions** | + | * [[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2169303|Reference]] |
| + | |||
| + | === Discussions === | ||
| * [[https://www.facebook.com/groups/GMOSF/permalink/431784640294125/|GMO Skepti-Forum discusses Bt and bees on Facebook]] | * [[https://www.facebook.com/groups/GMOSF/permalink/431784640294125/|GMO Skepti-Forum discusses Bt and bees on Facebook]] | ||
| Line 23: | Line 21: | ||
| ===== Health ===== | ===== Health ===== | ||
| - | [[http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/content/early/2014/08/27/jas.2014-8124.abstract|Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations (2014)]] | + | ==== Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations (2014) ==== |
| - | **Editorials** | + | * [[http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/content/early/2014/08/27/jas.2014-8124.abstract| Abstract]] |
| + | |||
| + | === Editorials === | ||
| * [[http://www.forbes.com/sites/jonentine/2014/09/17/the-debate-about-gmo-safety-is-over-thanks-to-a-new-trillion-meal-study/|Forbes: The debate about GMO safety is over, thanks to a new trillion-meal study]] | * [[http://www.forbes.com/sites/jonentine/2014/09/17/the-debate-about-gmo-safety-is-over-thanks-to-a-new-trillion-meal-study/|Forbes: The debate about GMO safety is over, thanks to a new trillion-meal study]] | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| * [[http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140926101023.htm|Science Daily: No sign of health or nutrition problems from GMO livestock feed, study finds]] | * [[http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140926101023.htm|Science Daily: No sign of health or nutrition problems from GMO livestock feed, study finds]] | ||
| - | **Discussions** | + | === Discussions === |
| * [[https://www.facebook.com/groups/GMOSF/permalink/450270831778839/|GMO Skepti-Forum discusses van Eenennaam paper on Facebook]] | * [[https://www.facebook.com/groups/GMOSF/permalink/450270831778839/|GMO Skepti-Forum discusses van Eenennaam paper on Facebook]] | ||
| - | [[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278691511006399|Assessment of the health impact of GM plant diets in long-term and multigenerational animal feeding trials: A literature review (2011)]] | + | ==== Assessment of the health impact of GM plant diets in long-term and multigenerational animal feeding trials: A literature review (2011) ==== |
| - | **Editorials** | + | * [[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278691511006399|Reference]] |
| + | |||
| + | === Editorials === | ||
| * [[http://doccamiryan.wordpress.com/2011/12/14/no-long-term-effects-of-gmo-consumption-a-review-article-by-snell-et-al/|Cami Ryan: No long term effects of GMO consumption: a review article by Snell et al…]] | * [[http://doccamiryan.wordpress.com/2011/12/14/no-long-term-effects-of-gmo-consumption-a-review-article-by-snell-et-al/|Cami Ryan: No long term effects of GMO consumption: a review article by Snell et al…]] | ||
| * [[http://gmoanswers.com/ask/im-trying-avoid-conflicts-interest-so-i-was-just-wondering-if-all-scientists-who-test-long-terms|GMO Answers: I was just wondering if all the scientists who test the long terms safety issues of gmos work for Monsanto?]] | * [[http://gmoanswers.com/ask/im-trying-avoid-conflicts-interest-so-i-was-just-wondering-if-all-scientists-who-test-long-terms|GMO Answers: I was just wondering if all the scientists who test the long terms safety issues of gmos work for Monsanto?]] | ||
| - | [[http://www.ask-force.org/web/Food/NAP-Safety-GMO-Food-2004.pdf|Safety of genetically engineered foods (2004)]] | + | ==== Safety of genetically engineered foods (2004) ==== |
| + | |||
| + | * [[http://www.ask-force.org/web/Food/NAP-Safety-GMO-Food-2004.pdf|PDF]] | ||
| ===== Multiple Topics ===== | ===== Multiple Topics ===== | ||
| - | [[http://geneticliteracyproject.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Nicolia-20131.pdf|An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research (2013)]] | + | ==== An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research (2013) ==== |
| + | |||
| + | * [[http://geneticliteracyproject.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Nicolia-20131.pdf|PDF]] | ||
| - | **Editorials** | + | === Editorials === |
| * [[http://conversableeconomist.blogspot.com/2013/11/the-safety-of-bioengineered-crops.html|Conversable Economist: The safety of bioengineered crops]] | * [[http://conversableeconomist.blogspot.com/2013/11/the-safety-of-bioengineered-crops.html|Conversable Economist: The safety of bioengineered crops]] | ||
| Line 54: | Line 60: | ||
| * [[http://www.skepticalraptor.com/skepticalraptorblog.php/review-10-years-gmo-research-no-significant-dangers/|Skeptical Raptor: Review of 10 years of GMO research–no significant dangers]] | * [[http://www.skepticalraptor.com/skepticalraptorblog.php/review-10-years-gmo-research-no-significant-dangers/|Skeptical Raptor: Review of 10 years of GMO research–no significant dangers]] | ||
| - | **Discussions** | + | === Discussions === |
| * [[https://www.facebook.com/groups/GMOSF/permalink/434935769979012/|GMO Skepti-Forum discusses Nicolia review on Facebook]] | * [[https://www.facebook.com/groups/GMOSF/permalink/434935769979012/|GMO Skepti-Forum discusses Nicolia review on Facebook]] | ||
| - | [[http://ec.europa.eu/research/biosociety/pdf/a_decade_of_eu-funded_gmo_research.pdf|A decade of EU-funded GMO research (2010)]] | + | ===== A decade of EU-funded GMO research (2010) ===== |
| + | |||
| + | * [[http://ec.europa.eu/research/biosociety/pdf/a_decade_of_eu-funded_gmo_research.pdf|PDF]] | ||
| - | **Editorials** | + | === Editorials === |
| * [[http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-10-1688_en.htm|Press release: Commission publishes compendium of results of EU-funded research on genetically modified crops]] | * [[http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-10-1688_en.htm|Press release: Commission publishes compendium of results of EU-funded research on genetically modified crops]] | ||
| Line 66: | Line 74: | ||
| * [[http://westernfarmpress.com/management/gmo-research-again-points-safety-biotechnology|Western Farm Press: GMO research again points to safety of biotechnology]] | * [[http://westernfarmpress.com/management/gmo-research-again-points-safety-biotechnology|Western Farm Press: GMO research again points to safety of biotechnology]] | ||
| - | ==== Current Research ==== | + | ===== Current Research ===== |
| * [[http://www.rothamsted.ac.uk/our-science/rothamsted-gm-wheat-trial|Rothamsted GM Wheat Trial]] | * [[http://www.rothamsted.ac.uk/our-science/rothamsted-gm-wheat-trial|Rothamsted GM Wheat Trial]] | ||
| - | * [[http://genera.biofortified.org/viewall.php|The Genetic Engineering Risk Atlas]] (GENERA) was created by Biofortified to allow individuals to easily search the many available peer-reviewed papers on genetic engineering. | + | * [[http://genera.biofortified.org/viewall.php|The Genetic Engineering Risk Atlas]] (GENERA) was created by Biofortified to allow individuals to easily search the many available peer-reviewed papers on genetic engineering. There are hundreds of studies on GMO safety, and they are not all listed here. This list contains some of the larger or better-known reviews. |
| ===== Official Statements on Safety ===== | ===== Official Statements on Safety ===== | ||